Islam

From the J-Walk blog: Pat Robertson answers a question from a “pastor of a ministry to international college students” who asks whether his ministry leaders should be permitted to study the Koran in order to understand Islam, which he thinks is a bad idea since “there are plenty of Christian resources out there to get information on other religions." Robertson’s reply: Kelly, it won’t be wrong if somebody studies Islam, but they need guided study, because somebody needs to go along and point out the incredible inconsistencies in that book. And if you have a guided study of the Koran and see how much in there is just repetitious, how much comes out of the Old Testament and the New Testament, how much is just plagiarism from the Bible, etc.?. ...

Daniel Zubairi, one of McCain’s state leaders for Maryland, stepped forward to publicly criticize a person who was criticizing Obama and claiming that he’s tainted because of a Muslim background. CNN wanted to put Zubairi on air, but the McCain campaign said no. (Via Daily Kos.)

Reuters reports that nighttime satellite photos from Sunni Arab areas of Baghdad show that the lights in those areas began to go out before the U.S. troop surge began in 2007, suggesting that population shift, rather than the surge, may have had greater responsibility for the drop in violence.

Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy (TIZA), a K-8 charter school run out of the headquarters of the Muslim American Society of Minnesota and run by an imam, Asad Zaman, teaches Islamic studies and has mandatory prayers led by a non-student. See, Christians–this is what the separation of church and state legally prohibits schools from doing with your tax dollars. Get it? UPDATE (April 11, 2008): Very many conservative bloggers, including Michelle Malkin and the morons at Stop the ACLU, are protesting TIZA and asking why the ACLU isn’t doing anything. In fact, the ACLU was on this issue before any conservative bloggers were, though they are hampered by the lack of a plaintiff. These bloggers are blatantly expressing their hypocrisy. If the ACLU was so much as sending a warning letter to a charter school promoting Christianity, they’d be protesting it. But since it’s Islam, the ACLU can’t possibly do enough. ...

I’ve put up a post at the Secular Outpost about Dutch MP Geert Wilders’ new film criticizing the Koran, “Fitna,” which has, unsurprisingly, resulted in governmental demands for YouTube to remove the video and calls for boycotts of Dutch goods. Read it at the Secular Outpost. Also see P.Z. Myers’ commentary on it at Pharyngula.

It was only a matter of time. Where John Todd, Mike Warnke, “Lauren Stratford,” and others found that they could get attention and money by claiming to be ex-Satanists/witches/Illuminati converted to Christian evangelists, we now see “ex-Islamic terrorists” turned born-again Christians and hitting the lecture circuit, and getting paid for appearances at the U.S. Air Force Academy, as the New York Times reports. The Times article ends with the most obvious question: Arab-American civil rights organizations question why, at a time when the United States government has vigorously moved to jail or at least deport anyone with a known terrorist connection, the three men, if they are telling the truth, are allowed to circulate freely. A spokesman for the F.B.I. said there were no warrants for their arrest.Of the three speakers, Zak Anani, Kamal Saleem, and Walid Shoebat, Anani is described as the most explicitly preaching born-again Christianity rather than providing information about Islamic terrorism. He also seems to be the one with the clearest record of making false claims about his own background: Anani, now an evangelical Christian, claims to be an expert on the topic because he killed 223 people in Allah’s name, “two-thirds of them by daggers.” He even claims to have killed a man for waking him up at 3 a.m. to pray. Anani, born in Lebanon, said he joined a militant Muslim group in the early 1970s at age 13, and made his first kill shortly after. … He said he was soon promoted to troop leader and formed his own regiment, but later met a Christian missionary and converted. ...

As ZDNet reports, yesterday afternoon, in response to a government order to filter YouTube (AS 36561), Pakistan Telecom (AS 17557, pie.net.pk) announced a more-specific route (/24; YouTube announces a /23) for YouTube’s IP space, causing YouTube’s Internet traffic to go to Pakistan Telecom. YouTube then re-announced its own IP space in yet more-specific blocks (/25), which restored service to those willing to accept routing announcements for blocks that small. Then Pakistan Telecom’s upstream provider, PCCW (AS 3491), which had made the mistake of accepting the Pakistan Telecom /24 announcement for YouTube in the first place, shut off Pakistan Telecom completely, restoring YouTube service to the world minus Pakistan Telecom. They got what they wanted, but not quite in the manner they intended. Don’t mess with the Internet. Martin Brown gives more detail at the Renesys Blog, including a comment on how this incident shows that it’s still a bit too easy for a small ISP to disrupt service by hijacking IPs, intentionally or inadvertently. Danny McPherson makes the same point at the Arbor Networks blog, and also gives a good explanation of how the Pakistan Internet provider screwed up what they were trying to do. Somebody still needs to update the Wikipedia page on how Pakistan censors the Internet to cover this incident. UPDATE: BoingBoing reports that the video which prompted this censorship order was an excerpt from Dutch Member of Parliament Geert Wilders’ film “Forbidden” criticizing Islam, which was uploaded to YouTube back on January 28. I’ve added “religion” and “Islam” as labels on this post, accordingly. The two specific videos mentioned by Reporters without Borders as prompting the ban have been removed from YouTube, one due to “terms of use violation” and one “removed by user." The first of these two videos was supposedly the Geert Wilders one; the second was of voters describing election fraud during the February 18 Parliamentary elections in Pakistan. This blog suggests that the latter video was the real source of the attempted censorship gone awry, though the Pakistan media says it was the former. So perhaps the former was the pretext, and the latter was the political motivator. A “trailer” for Wilders’ film is on YouTube here. Wilders speaks about his film on YouTube here and here. Ayaan Hirsi Ali defends Wilders on Laura Ingraham’s show on Fox News here. (Contrary to the blog post I’ve linked to, Hirsi Ali was not in the Theo Van Gogh film “Submission Part One,” which can itself be found here, rather, she wrote it. Van Gogh was murdered as a result of it. The beginning and end is in Arabic with Dutch subtitles, but most of it is in English with Dutch subtitles.) UPDATE (February 26, 2008): This just in, from Reuters–Pakistan “might have been” the cause of the YouTube outage. Way to be on the ball with breaking news, Reuters! The Onion weighs in on the controversy!

The Goldwater Institute will be giving Ayaan Hirsi Ali, former Muslim turned atheist author of the book Infidel, its 2007 Goldwater award at an event in Phoenix later this year. I plan to attend and will report here afterward.

The series “America at a Crossroads” commissioned a series of films about Islam in America that will air next week. One of the films, “Islam v. Islamists: Voices From the Muslim Center,” by Martyn Burke, will not be shown. Burke, who was previously the producer of “Pirates of Silicon Valley” and “The Hollywood Ten,” says that his film was dropped for political reasons (including the fact that two of his co-producers, Frank Gaffney and Alex Alexiev, are neoconservatives from the Center for Security Policy) after “tampering” by PBS and managers from WETA Washington D.C. He listed these examples of tampering: • A WETA manager pressed to eliminate a key perspective of the film: The claim that Muslim radicals are pushing to establish “parallel societies” in America and Europe governed by Shariah law rather than sectarian courts. • After grants were issued, Crossroads managers commissioned a new film that overlapped with Islam vs. Islamists and competed for the same interview subjects. • WETA appointed an advisory board that includes Aminah Beverly McCloud, director of World Islamic Studies at DePaul University. In an “unparalleled breach of ethics,” Burke says, McCloud took rough-cut segments of the film and showed them to Nation of Islam officials, who are a subject of the documentary. They threatened to sue.PBS claims that Burke’s film was not completed on time, had “serious structural problems” and was “irresponsible” and “alarmist, and it wasn’t fair." Burke’s film featured Phoenix medical doctor Zuhdi Jasser, head of the Islamic Forum for Democracy, a non-profit that advocates “patriotism, constitutional democracy, and a separation of church and state.” Jasser, a staunch Republican and former U.S. Navy physician, was an internist at the Office of the Attending Physician at the U.S. Capitol in the late nineties. There are more details and a short clip of Jasser from the film at the Arizona Republic (from which the above bulleted points are quoted). ...

A very interesting documentary about white Southern Baptists in Texas converting to Islam–apparently because they don’t find Christianity conservative enough. The speculation from Mark Plus in the comments is also interesting–that perhaps the constant propagandizing against radical Islam has caused some to switch allegiances through something like Stockholm Syndrome–but the one subject, Eric, converted 14 years ago.