Intelligent Design

Another negative review for the film, by Jeffrey Kluger. He specifically calls out the film for dishonesty: The man made famous by Ferris Bueller, however, quickly wades into waters far too deep for him. He makes all the usual mistakes nonscientists make whenever they try to take down evolution, asking, for example, how something as complex as a living cell could have possibly arisen whole from the earth’s primordial soup. The answer is it couldn’t–and it didn’t. Organic chemicals needed eons of stirring and slow cooking before they could produce compounds that could begin to lead to a living thing. More dishonestly, Stein employs the common dodge of enumerating all the admittedly unanswered questions in evolutionary theory and using this to refute the whole idea. But all scientific knowledge is built this way. A fishnet is made up of a lot more holes than strings, but you can’t therefore argue that the net doesn’t exist. Just ask the fish. ...

Scientific American: …it seems a safe bet that the producers hope a whipping from us would be useful for publicity: further proof that any mention of ID outrages the close-minded establishment. (Picture Ben Stein as Jack Nicholson, shouting, “You can’t handle the truth!”) Knowing this, we could simply ignore the movie–which might also suit their purposes, come to think of it. Unfortunately, Expelled is a movie not quite harmless enough to be ignored. Shrugging off most of the film’s attacks–all recycled from previous pro-ID works–would be easy, but its heavy-handed linkage of modern biology to the Holocaust demands a response for the sake of simple human decency. ...

XVIVO LLC has sent a copyright infringement warning letter to Premise Media about the computer animation that appears to have been based on XVIVO’s “The Inner Life of a Cell.” Some have speculated that “Expelled”’s release was moved from February to April because it had used the XVIVO film directly (just as William Dembski and other Discovery Institute fellows had been doing in public lectures), and they used the time to re-create the animation on their own. The letter says that XVIVO considers the segment in the film to still be close enough to be an infringement of their intellectual property rights, and demands: That Premise Media, Rampant Films, and its officers, employees, and agents remove the infringing segment from all copies of the “Expelled” film prior to its scheduled commercial release on or before April 18, 2008; ...

Roger Friedman at Fox News reviews “Expelled”: “Expelled” is a sloppy, all-over-the-place, poorly made (and not just a little boring) “expose” of the scientific community. It’s not very exciting. But it does show that Stein, who’s carved out a career selling eye drops in commercials and amusing us on sitcoms, is either completely nuts or so avaricious that he’s abandoned all good sense to make a buck.Looks like “Expelled”’s positive reviews are limited to those by right-wing political talk show hosts on whose shows they’re buying advertising. ...

Alonzo Fyfe, the Atheist Ethicist, has come up with an interesting suggestion–rather than purchase a ticket to go see “Expelled,” purchase a “truth ticket” by sending a contribution equal in value to a movie ticket ($10 is the suggested number) to the National Center for Science Education. (Click that link, and select “donation only.”) Alonzo’s sending 10 “truth tickets” worth of payment to the NCSE to promote good science. I’ll match him, and raise him 5 “truth tickets.” Anyone else care to buy a few? Pass it on… UPDATE (April 8, 2008): P.Z. Myers compares this idea to carbon offsets. The Panda’s Thumb has also reported on the idea. UPDATE: BTW, if you must see the film in the theater (my wife and I rarely go to the movies anymore, since Netflix is so much more convenient, and I don’t really have any interest in seeing this movie in any case), wait until after opening weekend. The “stupidity offset” for contributing to the opening weekend box office gross should probably be a much, much larger donation to the NCSE–better to make a smaller donation and see it the following week, if you must. ...

Wesley Elsberry has been in an extended exchange with Kevin Miller, co-writer of “Expelled,” in which Miller makes it clear that he’s unwilling to look at or attempt to address any actual evidence. Instead, he falls back on supporting postmodernist claims that everything is subject to interpretation. But he doesn’t give any reasons to support his purported interpretation, and ultimately descends into namecalling. Historical Comments Eamon Knight (2008-04-06): The reductio absurdum of fundamentalist absolutism: citing post-modern relativism in their defense.It is to laugh. ...

Movies.go.com is another site that now lists “Expelled” with an April 18 release date, and includes a poll on how good you think the movie is likely to be. With 474 votes, the ratings are: A - Sizzlin’: 11% B - Cool: 1% C - Decent: 1% D - DVD-only: 2% F - Vile: 85% Gridman (2008-04-05): I didn't vote until after you posted the link to the vote and it saids there were only 467 votes after I voted...More expelled trickery? :-)Still 85% vile, though... ...

Felix Salmon at Portfolio.com offers an interesting review of “Expelled” from a non-scientist. Robert McHenry at the Encyclopedia Brittanica looks at some of the arguments of “Expelled." And you can find more information at the NCSE’s “Expelled Exposed” web page.

Science Blogger (and 2007 Arizona Professor of the Year) John Lynch signed up for the Tempe screening of “Expelled” which was supposed to occur at 7 p.m. last night. He received an email on April 2 telling him that it had been cancelled. But it wasn’t cancelled–it was just moved to 6 p.m. (as Lynch had been informed in an earlier email), and went on at Arizona Mills Mall as planned. Apparently the producers just decided to screen out some of the prospective attendees by lying to them, and professors who win awards for the excellence of their teaching are considered undesirables. Lynch noted that others were cc’d on both of the notices he received, and that while those with email addresses containing names like “boughtbythecross,” “homeschoolma,” and “covenant-dad” apparently didn’t receive the bogus cancellation notice. Lynch’s post has links to some comments containing reports of the event from those who still managed to attend. UPDATE: In Louisville, Kentucky, they also claimed that a screening was cancelled, but a screening for students and staff at the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary did take place on the appointed date, and the schedule of events shows the screening as having taken place. Again, “undesirables” were screened out and not informed of the change in venue.

Intelligent design advocate Michael Behe scored another “own goal” like he did in the Dover trial, this time in the law suit by the Association of Christian Schools International and Calvary Chapel Christian School against the University of California. ACSI and Calvary were arguing that the UC system was unfairly refusing to accept transfer credits from certain courses taught at Christian schools which used inadequate materials in their curriculum. Behe testified in court on behalf of the plaintiffs that “it is personally abusive and pedagogically damaging to de facto require students to subscribe to an idea . . . . Requiring a student to, effectively, consent to an idea violates [her] personal integrity. Such a wrenching violation [may cause] a terrible educational outcome." The judge cited this reasoning in his decision in favor of the University of California: Yet, the two Christian biology texts at issue commit this “wrenching violation.” For example, Biology for Christian Schools declares on the very first page that: (1) “‘Whatever the Bible says is so; whatever man says may or may not be so,’ is the only [position] a Christian can take . . . ." ...