David Paszkiewicz

The ACLU and People for the American Way held a press conference today regarding the David Paszkiewicz situation at Kearny High School. On Tuesday, February 13, a tort claims notice was filed with the federal court to preserve the LaClair’s right to file a civil suit should the district not resolve their complaints. Predictably, Kearny education board president Bernadette McDonald was quoted as saying, “It is unfortunate that public dollars will be spent in defending our school district when this matter is already being addressed through dialogue and action.” Those actions included banning taping in the classroom without the teacher’s permission (which would have prevented Paszkiewicz from being caught lying about what he said in the classroom) and switching Paszkiewicz’s U.S. History class with another (so that he no longer has Matthew LaClair in his classroom). More information at the Jersey Journal and 1010 WINS web pages. The Jersey Journal story emphasizes the education board’s position, while the 1010 WINS story emphasizes Matthew LaClair’s. UPDATE (February 20, 2007): The audio of the ACLU/PFAW/LaClair press conference and the text of the Kearny education board’s response may be found at Kevin Canessa’s Corner at The Observer blog. UPDATE (February 21, 2007): Looks like CNN picked up the story yesterday. ...

The latest news from Kearny High School, via Kevin Canessa at the Observer, is that David Paszkiewicz has removed what he sees as the source of his problems from his classroom by switching classes with another teacher. Now, Debbie Vartan teaches Paszkiewicz’s class and vice versa. Principal Alfred Somma confirms that Paszkiewicz requested the switch. Apparently the ban on classroom recordings wasn’t enough–Paszkiewicz must realize that Matthew LaClair has more credibility than he does with the mainstream media, and his presence in the classroom was cramping his style. Here’s hoping that there’s someone who was in Debbie Vartan’s class who’s got as much integrity and brains as Matthew LaClair, and who will keep the public informed of any further misrepresentations or Establishment clause violations in Paszkiewicz’s classroom.

Last week in class David Paszkiewicz was discussing Adolf Hitler and the “Big Lie” propaganda technique. His example of a “Big Lie” being spread today: global warming. In Paszkiewicz’s backwards world, it’s not global warming denial that’s a big lie, it’s the scientific evidence supporting it. Kearny High School has taken action regarding Paszkiewicz’s continuing embarrassment of the school–by banning classroom taping without permission of the instructor. (They have also planned mandatory training for teachers on “how to interpret the Constitution’s separation of church and state and how it should apply to classroom discussions,” as I reported last month.) The New York Times has the story. ...

The Kearny Board of Education released a memo and statement last week regarding “the expression of personal religious beliefs by professional staff in the classroom." They have indicated that they will be hiring an outside professional to provide training to its teachers about “Constitutional parameters” and will institute a formal policy “expressing its strong commitment to the principle that personal religious beliefs of our institutional staff have no place in our classrooms."

My letter to the editor in response to David Paszkiewicz’s letter in the Observer was too late for the print edition, but was published on the newspaper’s blog. Here’s the letter with a couple typos corrected (“nor” for “not” and an extraneous possessive): David Paszkiewicz quotes from Thomas Jefferson’s April 21, 1803 letter to Benjamin Rush in support of his argument that the Founding Fathers would have agreed with his bringing his religious views into the public school classroom. The original letter, in Jefferson’s handwriting, can be found on the Internet at the Library of Congress: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/religion/rel06-2.html What Jefferson actually wrote in this letter was “To the corruptions of Christianity I am indeed opposed; but not to the genuine precepts of Jesus himself. I am a Christian in the only sense in which he wished any one to be; sincerely attached to his doctrines, in preference to all others; ascribing to himself every human excellence; & believing he never claimed any other.” In other words, Jefferson rejected the divinity and miracles attributed to Jesus. His “Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth” (also known as the “Jefferson Bible”) was composed by removing miracles and claims of godhood from the gospels. Paszkiewicz’s quote comes from a letter from Jefferson to Charles Thomson on January 9, 1816, regarding his “Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth,” stating that he is “a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus” in that work. This letter may be found online here: http://etext.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=JefLett.sgm&images=images/modeng&data=/texts/english/modeng/parsed&tag=public∂=2 37&division=div1 Paszkiewicz also misquotes George Washington’s May 12, 1789 address to the Delaware Indians–what Washington said was “You do well to wish to learn our arts and ways of life, and above all, the religion of Jesus Christ. These will make you a greater and happier people than you are. Congress will do every thing they can to assist you in this wise intention.” He said nothing about teaching this in schools nor that he believed it; he was giving the Indians advice for cultural assimilation. Paszkiewicz argues that because the words “separation of church and state” are not in the Constitution (a document that contains no reference to God), the concept is not there, either. But neither are the words “checks and balances,” and the New Testament contains no use of the word “trinity,” for that matter–the concepts are expressed using other words. The arguments over the wording of the First Amendment make it clear that the Founding Fathers were very concerned about religious control of government resulting in persecution of those with different beliefs, as had already occurred with established religions in the colonies, such as persecutions by the Puritans in Massachusetts. Jim Lippard Phoenix, Arizona

At long last, Kearny, NJ U.S. History teacher and Baptist youth minister David Paszkiewicz has spoken out publicly about his teaching (in a letter to his local newspaper), and has publicly displayed his incompetence on early U.S. history in the process. Paszkiewicz’s letter shows that his knowledge of the Founding Fathers and the First Amendment comes from crackpot pseudo-historian David Barton. He misrepresents the views of Jefferson, Washington, and Franklin using out-of-context and fabricated quotations, makes the bogus argument that because the words “separation of church and state” aren’t in the U.S. Constitution that the concept isn’t there either, and generally shows that he doesn’t understand the subject matter he teaches. Kennesaw State University history professor David Parker shows that Paszkiewicz’s alleged Jefferson quotation from an April 21, 1803 letter to Benjamin Rush is not found in that letter. (There’s something somewhat similar, but Paszkiewicz’s version changes the meaning by dishonestly adding and removing words from what Jefferson actually wrote.) Paszkiewicz misrepresents Jefferson’s religious views, failing to recognize that Jefferson did not believe in the divinity or miracles of Jesus, and edited the gospels into “Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth” (sometimes known as the “Jefferson Bible”) by removing all of the miracles. Ed Brayton at Dispatches from the Culture Wars addresses Paszkiewicz’s claims in more detail, showing that he doesn’t understand the role of the U.S. judicial system. Mr. Paszkiewicz, already considered a fool, has spoken and removed all doubt. (Hat tip to Pharyngula.) UPDATE (January 15, 2007): I’ve removed the statement that Ed Brayton has shown that Paszkiewicz used a fabricated Washington quotation, though it appears Washington didn’t mean what Paszkiewicz thought he did, and Paszkiewicz didn’t quote it correctly. The correct quotation, part of Washington’s advice for assimilation, is “You do well to wish to learn our arts and ways of life, and above all, the religion of Jesus Christ. These will make you a greater and happier people than you are. Congress will do every thing they can to assist you in this wise intention.” He didn’t say he believed it, he said to learn it. An interesting and lengthy examination of the history of the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause can be found in Noah Feldman’s “The Intellectual Origins of the Establishment Clause” (PDF) from the May 2002 New York University Law Review (vol. 77, pp. 346-428). ...

Today’s New York Times contains an editorial criticizing the “strange silence in Kearny” in response to David Paszkiewicz’s proselytizing in his U.S. History classroom: The vast majority of Americans deplore such proselytizing in public classrooms. But the truly disturbing aspect of all this, described earlier this month by Times reporter Tina Kelley, is not that one teacher so blatantly crossed the church-state boundary but that so few school officials and community residents seemed bothered by his behavior.The editorial points out the bravery of Matthew LaClair: The only reason anyone knows about Mr. Paskiewicz’s behavior is that one student, Matthew LaClair, 16, had the courage to speak up in September. Before doing so, he taped Mr. Paszkiewicz for eight classes because he feared officials would not believe him. He has since received one death threat, lost many friends, and says he can “feel the glares” when he goes to school.The editorial concludes: ...

I just came across this letter from Paul LaClair at the Observer (Kearny’s newspaper) editor’s blog site, which corrects some misconceptions that have occurred in some of the reporting and commentary on this issue, as well as point out some additional details about Paszkiewicz and the school administrators’ response that have not been reported elsewhere, such as: * After receiving a reprimand on September 25 in response to Matthew LaClair’s initial complaint, Paszkiewicz made a statement in class that implied that the student who complained had misrepresented his words. (I.e., he lied.) At this point, Matthew LaClair requested a meeting with administrators and produced the recordings. * Subsequent to this, the LaClairs have asked for further corrective action, but none has been forthcoming. * The school’s attorney has been evasive and even suggested that the LaClair’s go ahead and sue. The letter is well worth reading in its entirety. You can find it here. ...

David Paszkiewicz, the U.S. history teacher at Kearny High School in New Jersey who has been using his classroom to spread his religious views and has been defended by his students and fellow residents of Kearny, has now made the New York Times. The principal is quoted as saying that he is unaware of any previous problems, but there have been comments left at my blog stating that Paszkiewicz has been doing this for many years. The principal also claims that corrective action was taken–a reprimand was supposedly given back on September 25–but Paszkiewicz’s classroom style doesn’t appear to have changed much in later classroom recordings (I have heard some samples from September 26, 27, 29, and October 3 and 4). The New York Times article makes it clear how bad Paszkiewicz has been–even conservative legal groups have no interest in defending him: ...

The website KearnyontheWeb.com is an online forum for people in Kearny, New Jersey, where U.S. History teacher and Baptist youth pastor David Paszkiewicz has used his Kearny High School classroom (apparently for years) to evangelize students with his own brand of Christianity and conservative politics. I’ve already commented on how some Kearny High School students have made a poor case defending Paszkiewicz, now I’m afraid the adults of Kearny are no better. The adults posting at KearnyontheWeb.com are noteworthy (just like the students) for a complete failure to address the issues raised by Paszkiewicz’s actions–they ignore the content of what he’s been teaching, they ignore the fact that he lied about what he had done until confronted with the recordings, and they ignore the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Instead, they accuse Matthew LaClair of having set the teacher up, invent new “crimes” like “premeditated entrapment” that they accuse LaClair of having committed by recording the class, and say that he should have been suspended, expelled, or jailed for creating this issue and “embarrassing the town.” They say that LaClair, by protesting the Bush administration by refusing to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance, “practically spits on our ‘Pledge of Allegiance’” and “is free to leave this country if he does not agree with what we stand for!” They claim that Paszkiewicz is “the best teacher to hit town in years” and “A PROUD AMERICAN [who] IS 100% RIGHT!" I’ve posted there to point out the issues they aren’t addressing, to which the only response has not been any attempt to address those issues but to claim that there is no evidence that Paszkiewicz lied and to express doubt that I’ve actually listened to any of the recordings. (You can find a cleaned-up version of the first online recording here, some more recordings here, and a partial transcripts here and here and here. The November 22 issue of the Kearny Observer will include numerous transcripts from Paszkiewicz’s classes based on LaClair’s recordings. Also note that Kearny Observer editor Kevin Canessa has an online poll up on his blog about whether you support Paszkiewicz, LaClair, or neither. At the moment the results are 7 supporting Paszkiewicz, 8 supporting LaClair, 0 don’t care and 0 don’t know enough about the situation.) ...