Josh McDowell's conversion to Christianity

Chris Hallquist takes a look at the different versions of Josh McDowell’s testimony about being a former atheist who set out to disprove Christianity only to become a Christian, a finds some reasons to doubt its accuracy, as well as the quality of McDowell’s research. UPDATE (January 2, 2009): Vinny at You Call This Culture? notes that McDowell doesn’t appear to have actually been converted to Christianity on the basis of evidence: Commenting on the Hallquist post, self-identified Christian apologist Kevin H said that he had spoken with McDowell about the matter:He’s the kind of guy who is amused at all that is said about him. I noticed he was quick to correct falsehoods. For example, he told me that the evidence for Christianity was a “foot in the door” that kept him from immediately closing it. But it was the love of God that drew him. It seems he knows, whether his fault or the fault of the swirling influence of his books and speaking tours, that people have the conception that he was forced into faith by irresistable arguments. ...

October 16, 2007 · 6 min

Early U.S. income tax

I’m in the process of reading Akhil Reed Amar’s America’s Constitution: A Biography, and just came to the portion about the 16th Amendment, which instituted a federal income tax. I had already known that the tax was a very low percentage, but I hadn’t realized that only the top 1% of income earners paid any income tax. It would be a nice model to go back to, but not possible without dramatically reducing federal spending–the wealthiest Americans wouldn’t tolerate an extortionate percentage of taxation that would be required on the current level of spending, and given the huge amounts of money that are now a part of political campaigning, nobody gets elected without the support of at least some of the wealthiest Americans. (And those levels of spending are tied together–there’s huge money riding on political campaigns because there’s huge money and power in the hands of the federal government. The only way to reduce the former is to reduce the latter.) Here are the two paragraphs where Amar describes pre-Civil War and post-16th Amendment income taxes in the United States: Prior to the Civil War, at least seven states had adopted income taxes. High exemptions and graduated rates–the basic features of a progressive tax structure–were commonplace in these states. Congress followed this pattern when introducing a federal income tax in the 1860s. For instance, the 1865 federal tax code exempted all persons who made less than $600, taxed income between $600 and $5,000 at 5 percent, and subjected all income above $5,000 to a steeper 10 percent rate. Later federal laws tweaked the specifics but preserved the basic structure, under which more than three-quarters of federal revenue came from the seven wealthiest states: New York (which itself generated more than 30 percent of the total national intake), Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Illinois, New Jersey, and Connecticut. Under the law struck down in Pollock, incomes over $4,000 were taxed at 2 percent, all others were exempt. According to Treasury Department estimates, less than 1 percent of the population had been subject to this levy. … In the first income-tax statute enacted after the new amendment was in place, Congress once again opted for a progressive tax structure that exempted a large swath of low- and middle-income persons and taxed the rest at a sloping rate, beginning at 1 percent for an individual making $3,000 and topping out at 7 percent for income over $500,000. The $3,000 minimum threshold effectively limited the tax to the top 1 percent of the economic order. In 1916 the Supreme Court unanimously upheld the new tax law, expressly rejecting the notion that the “progressive feature” of the tax somehow rendered it unconstitutional. The American People had spoken and–this time, at least–the Court listened.

August 25, 2007 · 3 min

Critical reviews of Michael Behe's The Edge of Evolution

Blake Stacey is maintaining a list, at Science after Sunclipse.

June 5, 2007 · 1 min

Which SF classics have you read?

The meme is to bold the ones you’ve read…. The Lord of the Rings, J.R.R. Tolkien The Foundation Trilogy, Isaac Asimov Dune, Frank Herbert Stranger in a Strange Land, Robert A. Heinlein A Wizard of Earthsea, Ursula K. Le Guin Neuromancer, William Gibson Childhood’s End, Arthur C. Clarke Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, Philip K. Dick The Mists of Avalon, Marion Zimmer Bradley Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury The Book of the New Sun, Gene Wolfe A Canticle for Leibowitz, Walter M. Miller, Jr. The Caves of Steel, Isaac Asimov Children of the Atom, Wilmar Shiras Cities in Flight, James Blish The Colour of Magic, Terry Pratchett Dangerous Visions, edited by Harlan Ellison Deathbird Stories, Harlan Ellison The Demolished Man, Alfred Bester Dhalgren, Samuel R. Delany Dragonflight, Anne McCaffrey Ender’s Game, Orson Scott Card The First Chronicles of Thomas Covenant the Unbeliever, Stephen R. Donaldson The Forever War, Joe Haldeman Gateway, Frederik Pohl Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, J.K. Rowling The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams I Am Legend, Richard Matheson Interview with the Vampire, Anne Rice The Left Hand of Darkness, Ursula K. Le Guin Little, Big, John Crowley Lord of Light, Roger Zelazny The Man in the High Castle, Philip K. Dick Mission of Gravity, Hal Clement More Than Human, Theodore Sturgeon The Rediscovery of Man, Cordwainer Smith On the Beach, Nevil Shute Rendezvous with Rama, Arthur C. Clarke Ringworld, Larry Niven Rogue Moon, Algis Budrys The Silmarillion, J.R.R. Tolkien Slaughterhouse-5, Kurt Vonnegut Snow Crash, Neal Stephenson Stand on Zanzibar, John Brunner The Stars My Destination, Alfred Bester Starship Troopers, Robert A. Heinlein Stormbringer, Michael Moorcock The Sword of Shannara, Terry Brooks (like P.Z. Myers, I started this one and found it unreadable) Timescape, Gregory Benford To Your Scattered Bodies Go, Philip Jose Farmer ...

March 11, 2007 · 3 min

Daniel Dennett on religion

This YouTube video is of a talk by Daniel Dennett at the TED conference in 2006, following (and commenting on) Pastor Rick Warren. jpbenney (2007-07-08): The idea that religion is a natural phenomenon is very reminiscent, oddly, of Jared Diamond in books like Guns, Germs and Steel and Collapse, as well as Phillip Longman. The idea of subjecting religion to serious social study, too, is nothing new. Leonard Shlain's The Alphabet versus the Goddess is a flawed if highly enthralling example.Daniel does seem an interesting person, I must say. He is very articulate and lively, so one imagine him to be a very convincing speaker. ...

March 10, 2007 · 1 min

Books for infidels at top of NYT bestseller lists

Mark Vuletic points out that the March 11 New York Times hardcover bestseller list includes five books of interest to infidels in the top 25: 7. Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s Infidel 12. Richard Dawkins’ The God Delusion 13. Chris Hedges’ American Fascists 21. Victor Stenger’s God: The Failed Hypothesis 24. Sam Harris’ Letter to a Christian Nation

March 9, 2007 · 1 min

Tidbits from the Economist

During my long plane flights this week, I used some of my time to catch up on reading back issues of The Economist. Here were a few of the stories I found particularly interesting in the January 6-12, 2007 issue: “Medicine at the Top of the World” (p. 65): LYING in an intensive-care ward is a world away from climbing Everest, but a connection will be drawn this spring when 45 scientists and 208 volunteers tackle the mountain to bring back information about oxygen deprivation. The reason they are going is that hypoxia (a lack of oxygen in cells, which can lead to death) is the one thing that links practically all patients in intensive-care wards—and there is no better place to study it than in the thin air of the world’s highest mountain.The story describes the Xtreme Everest expedition, which will take 250 people up Mount Everest, setting up mobile labs at various elevations to study hypoxia. The volunteers will climb up to 5,300 meters, and 16 climber-scientists will ascend to the summit to become the first to have blood drawn at the top of the world’s tallest mountain. The research will be used to try to identify the genetic basis of people’s ability to handle hypoxia, which couldn’t be easily be conducted on patients in intensive care due to not having enough of them in one place at the right time. “The logic of privacy” (pp. 65-66): ...

January 21, 2007 · 3 min

Interview with Jon Winokur

Guy Kawasaki interviews Jon Winokur, whose books of curmudgeonly quotations are prized possessions of mine. It was Winokur’s The Portable Curmudgeon which inspired me to track down and read the very entertaining autobiography of Oscar Levant. Here’s a short excerpt, chosen because it makes a point that is part of Paul Krassner’s standup act: Question: What are you working on now? Answer: The Big Curmudgeon, an omnibus edition of previous curmudgeon books plus new material, and The Big Book of Irony, a small-format hardcover in which I try to share my delight in the many facets of irony and clear up some misconceptions, because irony is widely misunderstood. It drives me crazy when people say “ironic” when they mean “coincidental.” The classic example is Morissettian Irony, which I define in the book as “irony based on a misapprehension of irony, i.e., no irony at all.” It’s named for the pop singer Alanis Morissette, whose hit single, “Ironic” mislabels coincidence and inconvenience as irony. In the song, situations purporting to be ironic are merely sad, random, or annoying (“It's a traffic jam when you're already late/It's a no-smoking sign on your cigarette break”). In other words, “Ironic” is an un-ironic song about irony. Which, of course, is ironic in itself. But wait, there’s more, a “bonus irony” if you will: “Ironic” has been cited as an example of how Americans don’t get irony, despite the fact that Alanis Morissette is Canadian! By the way, here's a rewrite of lines from Morissette's song to actually make them ironic. Historical Comments Ed Brayton (2007-01-16): Ah, I am also one who treasures Winokur's books, which I've been collecting for a long time. Great stuff. ...

January 15, 2007 · 2 min

Books Read in 2006

I read the following books in 2006. These are the ones I’ve finished–looks like I didn’t do nearly as well as last year. The links are to Amazon.com, where I’ve reviewed most of these. James Bovard, The Bush Betrayal Daniel Gilbert, Stumbling on Happiness John Grogan, Marley & Me: Life and Love with the World's Worst Dog Jim Harper, Identity Crisis: How Identification is Overused and MisunderstoodJohn Hodgman, The Areas of My Expertise Jennifer Michael Hecht, Doubt: A HistoryNick Hornby, A Long Way Down Paul Krassner, One Hand Jerking: Reports from an investigative satirist Lawrence Lessig, Free Culture: The Nature and Future of Creativity Cesar Millan with Melissa Jo Peltier, Cesar's Way: The Natural, Everyday Guide to Understanding & Correcting Common Dog Problems John Allen Paulos, A Mathematician Reads the Newspaper John Perkins, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man Gerald Posner, Why America Slept: The Failure to Prevent 9/11 V.S. Ramachandran, M.D., Ph.D., and Sandra Blakeslee, Phantoms in the Brain: Probing the Mysteries of the Human Mind Mary Roach, Spook: Science Tackles the AfterlifeRudy Rucker, Saucer Wisdom Thomas J. Stanley, The Millionaire MindNeil Strauss, The Game: Penetrating the Secret Society of Pickup Artists Martha Stout, Ph.D., The Sociopath Next Door Nick Webb, Wish You Were Here: The Official Biography of Douglas AdamsAnd these are the ones I haven't finished yet--some (Amar, Numbers, Zimmer) I just started, others have been hanging around for a while and I should probably give up on (some of these were started but uncompleted this time last year). The Girard and Lambot book is a beautiful, interesting, and quite expensive book that can be read one short biography at a time. Akhil Reed Amar, America's Constitution: A BiographyDiego Gambetta, The Sicilian Mafia: The Business of Private ProtectionGreg Girard and Ian Lambot, City of Darkness: Life in Kowloon Walled City Antonio Damasio, Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling BrainOlivia Judson, Dr. Tatiana's Sex Advice to All Creation Ronald Numbers, The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent DesignKevin Mandia, Chris Prosise, and Matt Pepe, Incident Response and Computer Forensics, Second EditionKevin Phillips, American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of BushCarl Shapiro and Hal R. Varian, Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network EconomySpammer-X, Inside the Spam Cartel: Trade Secrets from the Dark SideRobert H. Tillman and Michael L. Indergaard, Pump & Dump: The Rancid Rules of the New EconomyJohn Viega and Gary McGraw, Building Secure Software: How to Avoid Security Problems the Right WayVernor Vinge, The Collected Stories of Vernor VingeAndrew Vladimirov, Konstantin V. Gavrilenko, Andrei A. Mikhailovsky, WI-FOO: The Secrets of Wireless HackingCarl Zimmer, Evolution: The Triumph of an Idea(Previously: 2005.)

December 31, 2006 · 3 min

Robert Anton Wilson nears the end of his life

Robert Anton Wilson, co-author of the Illuminatus! trilogy (which was the inspiration for my domain name and computer naming scheme on my home network), is now bedridden and under 24-hour care. Some fans on the Internet have helped him raise funds for his continuing care, and you can buy a Robert Anton Wilson T-shirt to help out. UPDATE (January 11, 2007): Robert Anton Wilson died this morning at 4:50 a.m., PST. Jesse Walker reports on his final blog post, and Brian Doherty offers some interesting reflections. Though my only published writing about Robert Anton Wilson was rather critical, I greatly enjoyed and own most of his published work. UPDATE (January 12, 2007): And there’s more from Nick Gillespie here. ...

October 7, 2006 · 4 min
Mastodon Verification