Chandler school suspends student for drawing picture of gun

Payne Junior High School in Chandler, Arizona has suspended the 13-year-old son of Ben and Paula Mosteller for three days (reduced from five) for drawing a picture of a gun, an action which they characterized as a threat which they compared to the Columbine High School massacre in a discussion with his parents. The Arizona Republic reports that “The school did not contact police and did not provide counseling or an evaluate the boy to determine if he intended the drawing as a threat,” which suggests to me that they did not really consider it to be a threat. The boy’s parents described the picture as a harmless doodle of a fake laser, which did not show blood, bullets, injuries, or target any human. If the school really considered it a threat of an impending massacre, they should have treated it as one. Since they didn’t, why is it even worth a suspension? Is there more to the context that we aren’t being told, or are school administrators so irrational that they fear drawings of guns? Are there any adult males who didn’t draw guns along with cars, motorcycles, spaceships, monsters, aliens, and floor plans of secret hideouts when they were around 13? ...

August 22, 2007 · 2 min

Mr. Conservative

Tonight I attended the Goldwater Institute’s screening of the HBO documentary “Mr. Conservative," a biography of Barry Goldwater produced by his granddaughter, CC Goldwater, who was in attendance along with Barry Goldwater Jr. The audience was a mix of people who still call themselves conservative, libertarians, and even a few liberals. (Gary Peter Klahr sat directly behind me, and his question in the Q&A session was what Goldwater would have thought of the Bush administration’s power grab and war in Iraq. Barry Goldwater Jr.’s answer was that his father disliked foreign entanglements and supported the Constitution.) The film features footage and photographs taken by Barry Goldwater himself–the film notes that he always had a camera in his hand, and at least three books of his photographs have been published. He was born in Arizona prior to its statehood, to a Jewish father and an Episcopalian mother–which led to one quip from Goldwater reported by Robert MacNeil in the movie: “He would say things like, ‘I went to a golf club where they wouldn’t let Jews play, and I said, “I’m only half Jewish. Can I play nine holes?’" The movie features interviews with people ranging from George Will, Barry Goldwater, Jr., and Sandra Day O’Connor to Ben Bradlee, Sally Quinn, Al Franken, Julian Bond, and Hillary Clinton. Also featured is the exceedingly evil Jack Valenti. The film covers Goldwater’s life in Arizona, including his mother teaching him to shoot guns, his coming home from the University of Arizona to run the family store in Phoenix so his smarter older brother could stay at Stanford, his love of ham radio and flying airplanes (he would hear on the radio of medical emergencies among the Hopi Indians and personally deliver medicine from Phoenix–and this during his political career). He was a very early runner of the Colorado River (in 1940 using wooden dories–when fewer than 100 people had run the river; Goldwater was #73). He ran the river with camera equipment, making a film which he traveled about Arizona to show, which made him well-known before running for office. He won his first election to the Phoenix City Council, and went straight from the City Council to the U.S. Senate. In his later life, he was outspoken in his support for a woman’s right to abortion, for gays to serve in the military, and for the religious right to stop pushing their religious views into politics. The film reveals that he supported his daughter obtaining an abortion before Roe v. Wade, and that he has a gay grandson. Several of the more liberal interviewees say that they thought Goldwater became liberal later in life (and some in the audience seemed to have a similar view), but Goldwater himself is shown making a statement that preempts this claim, back in 1963–that he is a conservative, but that at some time in the future people will call his views liberal. He was a supporter of individual liberty who wanted the government’s role in private life minimized across the board, on both economic and social issues–it wasn’t he who changed, but the political environment that changed. I recommend the movie–it is well done, it fairly points out his foibles and flaws as well as his strengths. It is sad that there are virtually no politicians today who are as forthright, honest, and outspoken about their views–who are as genuine as he was. We need more people in the public sphere who speak out with integrity and honesty, rather than with dissembling and spin. UPDATE (August 17, 2007): I glossed over Goldwater’s negatives in my last paragraph, but the film doesn’t. It reports on how he lost the 1964 election in the biggest landslide in history, and why–including his opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (though he supported the Civil Rights Acts of 1957 and 1960, supported the Arizona NAACP, and helped desegregate the Arizona National Guard), his remarks about the use of atomic weapons for defoliation in Vietnam, and his remark about sawing off the eastern seaboard of the U.S. and letting it float away. LBJ’s political ad graphically depicting the latter remark and his famous “Daisy” mushroom cloud ad are shown in the film. Goldwater’s reaction to the latter is reported as saying that if he thought that accurately depicted what he would do, “I wouldn’t vote for me either." A few other points of interest in the film: Goldwater was a friend of John F. Kennedy, and they were looking forward to running against each other in the 1964 election, flying from city to city on the same plane together to campaign against each other face to face. That would have been an interesting match up. (I should note that my opinion of JFK is not as positive as the general public’s view, after having read how he made use of the CIA. He was one of the worst abusers of the CIA for interventions in attempt to overthrow the governments of other countries who ever sat in the White House.) Barry Goldwater Jr. was a long-time friend of Nixon White House counsel John Dean, and Dean consulted with Goldwater Sr. before testifying in front of the Senate about Watergate. Goldwater told him to go ahead and nail Nixon, because Nixon was a liar. During Watergate, Goldwater, whose wife had decided to remain in Arizona, spent much of his time in D.C. at the home of Lt. Gen. William W. Quinn and his wife Bette. The Quinn’s daughter Sally was a journalist engaged to Ben Bradlee, publisher of the Washington Post. Bradlee reports that Goldwater told him that he thought Nixon was going to resign, but not to publish a story about it because if he did, Nixon was so stubborn that he’d then refuse to do it. The Wikipedia page on Goldwater is quite comprehensive. UPDATE (August 18, 2007): Apparently the golf story is apocryphal. The discussion page on Goldwater’s Wikipedia entry says “In his autobiography, ‘Goldwater,’ BG attributes this joke to his brother Bob, speaking about HIS brother Barry at ‘a golf pro tournament near Los Angeles.’ B. Goldwater adds, ‘The story got a big laugh, but the incident never occurred.’”

August 17, 2007 · 5 min

Arizona doctors who question evolution

Physicians and Surgeons for Scientific Integrity is an organization of Darwin-denying doctors being touted by the Discovery Institute as evidence of growing dissent against evolution. Those on their membership list in Arizona: Dr. Richard D. Friedman, Internal Medicine, Chandler, Arizona Dr. Joseph M. Kezele, Emergency Medicine, Cave Creek, Arizona Dr. William H. Noland, Neurology, Tucson, Arizona Dr. Joel T. Rohrbough, Orthopaedic Surgery, Flagstaff, Arizona Dr. Allan T. Sawyer, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Glendale, Arizona Personally, given the new developments in biological science and medicine that are discovered as a result of evolutionary science, I would not want to use a doctor who denies evolution. ...

August 4, 2007 · 1 min

Jarrett Maupin Sr. and Jr. controversies

Jarrett Maupin II, protege of Al Sharpton, wants to be mayor of Phoenix, but unfortunately for his campaign, incumbent mayor Phil Gordon’s challenges to his ballot petitions have disqualified enough signatures to get him off the ballot. It seems that Maupin hired individuals with felony convictions to collect signatures, and a majority of his signatures were from people not registered to vote, leaving him 91 signatures short. Maupin said he was “outraged” by Gordon’s challenge of his petition and insisted that he would be on the ballot. Maupin got press by showing up at the mayor’s office with a voter registration form, stating that Gordon is a Democrat in name only and should switch his registration to Republican. Ironically, Maupin was head of the Young Republicans at Brophy College Preparatory (though this was before he was of legal voting age). I also just came across a news report from 2005, regarding Maupin’s father: ...

August 4, 2007 · 4 min

Words Fail Me...

July, 2007, saw 2503 Notices of Trustee’s Sales in Maricopa County - yet another record. Historical Comments houseofpain (2007-08-01): Holy moly, apocalypse!!! Anonymous (2007-08-01): I agree with house of pain. The pain is coming to the real estate market. I need more popcorn for this double feature.

July 31, 2007 · 1 min · Einzige

Arizona allows quacks to perform surgery

Orac at Respectful Insolence points out that a recent Arizona death after liposuction was a case of “minor surgery” being performed by a homeopath. And Arizona law permits these quacks to perform “minor surgery." UPDATE (July 28, 2007): Orac has more on what Arizona allows via its regulation of “homeopathy."

July 26, 2007 · 1 min

Back from the Grand Canyon

I spent most of the last nine days in the Grand Canyon, rafting down the Colorado River on the National Center for Science Education’s 2007 trip. I met interesting people and made new friends, ate great food, and saw amazing sights. This was my third trip down the Canyon, but my first in the last two decades (my previous two were in August 1976 and June 1985). This trip included the presentation of both creationist flood geology and real geology, but there was no contest–when you have hundreds of feet of successive ocean floor beds full of fossils of marine life that has lived and died, and a large variety of completely different kinds of formations that have clearly been deposited in different kinds of events, it’s transparently nonsense to claim that it was all laid down in a single year-long flood. Top photo: Grand Canyon about 25 miles downstream from Lee’s Ferry (mile 0); bottom photo: downstream view of river from Nankoweap Canyon (mile 53). UPDATE (August 7, 2007): Here’s a blog post about our trip by a member of the crew.

July 25, 2007 · 1 min

Arizona bans anti-Bush t-shirts

The Arizona legislature and the governor have passed legislation banning the sale of t-shirts that say “Bush Lied/They Died.” The Arizona legislature voted unanimously in favor of the ban, which allows for the punishment of a year in jail for using the names of deceased soldiers to sell goods, and gives the families of such soldiers the right to collect civil damages. This is an outrageous violation of the First Amendment to prohibit perfectly legitimate political speech using factual information in the public domain. Similar bans have also been passed in Louisiana, Texas, and Oklahoma, and are in the works in Florida. In Arizona, this law also violates the state constitution (Article 2, Sections 1, 2, and 6, in my non-lawyerly opinion). Several Democrats who voted for the bill have now agreed that they should not have, and made excuses for why they did: “I shouldn’t have voted the way I did,” House Minority Leader Phil Lopes said. The Tucson Democrat blamed his vote in favor of Senate Bill 1014 on a “senior moment." Rep. Tom Prezelski, D-Tucson, said he thought problems he originally had with the measure had been fixed. He acknowledged not reading the final version. And Rep. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Phoenix, conceded that she wasn’t paying attention and was totally unaware of the contents of the bill on which she voted at least twice—once after a proponent of the measure gave a short floor speech explaining the essence of the bill and why he believed it was necessary. Our governor, also a Democrat, has given an equally lame response when asked why she signed such a clearly unconstitutional bill: …gubernatorial press aide Jeanine L’Ecuyer said a divided vote would not have resulted in a veto. “Her concern is for the families who lost someone,” L’Ecuyer said. Asked if Napolitano, a lawyer, believes the measure is unconstitutional, L’Ecuyer’s only response was, “The governor signed the bill."Napolitano cannot be re-elected, and after this, she clearly should not be. Any legislator who voted for this bill should be given the boot, which means cleaning out the entire Arizona legislature. Toss the bums out! The shirts are being sold by Dan Frazier of Flagstaff, who also offers some different messages on top of the list of names of the fallen soldiers. The Arizona Civil Liberties Union has already filed a lawsuit to overturn the law (PDF). If anyone in Phoenix is interested in purchasing some of these shirts as part of a group purchase (or as my resale at cost to you, so I can work some civil disobedience of an unconstitutional law into it), please let me know. UPDATE (August 24, 2007): Dan Frazier has gone to court to get an injunction against the law, but it looks like the legislators wrote the law not only in ignorance of the Constitution, but in ignorance of what Frazier is doing–the law doesn’t ban the sale of items using the names of fallen soldiers, it bans advertising using the names of fallen soldiers. The names are not legible on Frazier’s website, so he may not fall afoul of the law. That doesn’t change the fact that it’s a bad, unconstitutional law, however. ...

July 13, 2007 · 3 min

The Trend Continues...

<img style=“display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;” src="/images/Jun07NTR.jpg" border=“0” alt=“Maricopa County’s Notices of Trustee’s Sales, 1993 - 2007"id=“BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5083422755374284578” /> June’s Notices of Trustee’s Sales for the Phoenix metro area topped out at 2330, continuing the trend line set a year or so ago. At this point I can’t help thinking we’ve got nowhere to go but up. Even the scammers are saying that Phoenix is a bad market.

July 4, 2007 · 1 min · Einzige

ASU, UA, and NAU salaries

The Arizona Republic’s website has posted a search page for the 2006 salaries of faculty and staff at Arizona State University, the University of Arizona, and Northern Arizona University. I took a quick look at UA and ASU’s philosophy departments, both of which have several professors making well over $100,000/year, and was struck at the oddness of some of the salaries–there are some excellent professors who have been teaching for a long time making less money than some who haven’t been around nearly as long, and an administrative assistant who makes more than most assistant and associate professors. UA has 28 people making over $300,000 (most at the medical school, whose salaries mostly come from non-state funds) and three making over $500,000–two of which are football and basketball coaches and one who is a professor of surgery at the medical school (only 17.4% of his salary is state-paid). Robert Shelton, president of UA, made $420,000. ASU has twelve people making over $300,000, and four making over $500,000–all of which are coaches for football and basketball. ASU president Michael Crow made $442,970. NAU has only one employee making over $200,000, which is NAU’s president John Haeger, who made $260,000. I suspect it’s still the case that professors at Arizona universities, on the average, make well above median salaries for Arizona’s major cities and occupations. Further, I suspect there may be quite a few ASU professors making six-figure salaries who are among Maricopa County’s 106,210 millionaire households. But they don’t compare to compensation for Arizona-based CEOs of publicly-traded companies, where the search engine options for salaries are “any amount,” “$1 million or more,” “$5 million or more,” and “$10 million or more.”

June 29, 2007 · 2 min
Mastodon Verification